| Poll: In theory - would 100 cores clocked at 100mhz be better than a single 10GHZ core? You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
| 100 cores @ 100mhz is more effective for today's applications and future application development. | 0 | 0% | |
| a single core @ 10GHZ is still more effective overall for our current software model, as well as the future development of software | 0 | 0% | |
| Total | 0 vote(s) | 0% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
In theory - more cores, or higher clock speed? |
May 31st, 2013 at 10:25 AM
I think both would be fine but I would have to go with 100 cores at 100MHz. Just because you could split the tasks over 20 or so cores. Having 5 intensive tasks running on different cores is surely better than having all 5 on one core.
Err what do I put here?<br /><br />I like Minecraft? I play Minecraft? <br />I play Sim City 4? I play Sim City 4?<br />I also don't like democracy!
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
In theory - more cores, or higher clock speed? - by Darth-Apple - May 17th, 2013 at 2:13 PM
Re: In theory - more cores, or higher clock speed? - by Gmdykfuiygh66476 - May 22nd, 2013 at 4:08 AM
Re: In theory - more cores, or higher clock speed? - by Durfsurn - May 31st, 2013 at 10:25 AM
|
| Possibly Related Threads… | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| Are there any significant speed improvements to 10000 RPM hard drives? | 2 | 5,539 |
May 27th, 2013 at 12:58 AM Last Post: Darth-Apple |
||
