February 3rd, 2021 at 4:42 AM
I totally forgot about this thread.
Really, anarchy just leads someone to become powerful no matter what. Someone is always seen as a leader sooner or later, and even if it's controlled (or deliberate) chaos, someone still ends up with the reigns.
But the idea of having a structured way for which the rules are always the same, a way that is democratic, that's always been interesting to me. Done right, it's certainly plausible. It'd take the right person to lead it though.
Really, anarchy just leads someone to become powerful no matter what. Someone is always seen as a leader sooner or later, and even if it's controlled (or deliberate) chaos, someone still ends up with the reigns.
But the idea of having a structured way for which the rules are always the same, a way that is democratic, that's always been interesting to me. Done right, it's certainly plausible. It'd take the right person to lead it though.
