Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

[Software] Benchmarking some machines. WIP.

#2
THE NUMBERS: HP ENVY x360
(Still WIP, will update continuously)

Here's the current HP x360 Envy's scores.
PCMark 10 - 3084
Unigine: Heaven (PasteBin)
Unigine: Valley (PasteBin)
3DMark 11: Fire Strike - 1440
GeekBench 5: CPU

OVERCLOCKS:
3DMark 11: Fire Strike - 1604 (OVERCLOCKED GPU)
 PCMark 10 - 2970 (OVERCLOCKED GPU)
GeekBench 5: GPU [CUDA]
GeekBench 5: GPU [OpenCL]

Code:
PCMark 10:   |  Stock GPU     |  OC GPU        |  % Delta
===================================================================
Overall:     |  3084          |  2970          | -  3.7%
Essentials:  |  7024          |  7018          | -  0.0%
* App Start: |    9346        |  9517          | +  1.8%
* Web:       |    6710        |  6499          | -  3.2%
* Video Con. |    5526        |  5590          | +  1.2%
Productivity:|  5568          |  4863          | - 12.7%
* Spreadsh.  |    6304        |  4753          | - 24.7%
* Writing    |    4918        |  4976          | +  1.2%
DCC:         |  2036          |  2085          | +  2.4%
* Video Edit:|    2830        |  2844          | +  0.5%
* Photo Edit:|    2312        |  2425          | +  4.9%
* Rendering: |    1291        |  1315          | +  1.9%

Code:
3DMark 11: FS  |  Stock GPU     |  OC GPU        |  % Delta
===================================================================
Overall:       |  1440          |  1604          | + 11.4%
Graphics:      |  1648          |  1807          | +  9.6%
* T1 Avg. FPS: |    8.12        |  8.24          | +  1.6%
* T2 Avg. FPS: |    6.42        |  7.51          | + 16.9%
Physics:       |  4638          |  4886          | +  5.3%
* Avg. FPS:    |    14.73       |  15.51         | +  5.3%
Combined:      |  484           |  563           | + 16.2%
* Avg. FPS:    |    2.25        |  2.62          | + 16.2%

UL/FutureMark claim that with consecutive testing, results should typically fall into a ~3% delta. So, with those standards, anything that has a % delta (last column) of -3% to +3% should be disregarded.
I increased my GPU clock by 135MHz, and Memory clock by 185MHz. That's +14% and +14.5%, respectively.
I know that changes don't increase linearly with the frequency increases, as Hz is reciprocal, but I would hope for some bigger gains than whatever PCMark is throwing back at me.
Perhaps I'll re-run the tests.

Notes:

PCMark 10 Wrote:Overall pretty satisfied with the numbers. Yeah, the overall score is low; it even lists it as lower than your typical Office machine. Granted, but what's actually bringing the score so low? Two things: Rendering (1291) & Digital Content Creation (2036.) Photo Score gets an honourable mention (2312) for the top 3. 
But the other scores are well above average, for instance the Apps score at a whopping Over 9000. 
It basically measures how fast things can start up, so the speedy NVMe drive certainly helps. But Web/Essentials are also pretty high. 

So I'm confident that if the GPU was better, this score would be DRASTICALLY higher.

3DMark 11 Wrote:The fans started maxing even while starting the application. Chrissake.
The software warned me that I should disable G-SYNC before running any of the tests, as it could negatively affect performance. 
I decided 'f*** it' since I ran every other benchmark already and want as much control variables as possible. So I left it on.

Overclocking Wrote:In the past I've mentioned how difficult it is to overclock this d*** GPU.
And it is.
But magically, using a tool from 2014 called Nvidia Inspector, I got it to +135MHz for processing clock and +180MHz for the Memory clock. 
Apparently, those are probably the safest performance vs. stability numbers out there.
And it looks like a bad(?) Nvidia Driver update broke MSI Afterburner that for their OC. I use a ? because they probably did it to stop people from OC'ing.

I suspect that something went seriously wrong during the OC PCMark 10 Spreadsheet test. I'll have to look into it, but the only thing I did differently was OC the GPU, which should have little to no effect at all.

Invalid GPU Wrote:Both 3DMark and PCMark are owned by UL, and their sysinfo can't seem to figure out what my GPU is.
When the application is open here I see the name and all the info, but on the results page there's that little 'Invalid' warning. For whatever reason, the results formally display as 'Generic VGA' or whatever.
I think that might have something to do with faulty/outdated Intel drivers. Since HP never approved an update past 2018 for the 620, I need to manually install the files and hope my whole computer doesn't blow up.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Benchmarking some machines. WIP. - by Lain - April 18th, 2020 at 7:57 PM
RE: Benchmarking some machines. WIP. - by Lain - April 19th, 2020 at 7:50 AM
RE: Benchmarking some machines. WIP. - by Lain - April 28th, 2020 at 5:58 PM
RE: Benchmarking some machines. WIP. - by Lain - May 7th, 2020 at 9:13 PM
RE: Benchmarking some machines. WIP. - by Guardian - May 7th, 2020 at 10:17 PM
RE: Benchmarking some machines. WIP. - by Lain - May 7th, 2020 at 10:34 PM
RE: Benchmarking some machines. WIP. - by Lain - May 11th, 2020 at 3:06 AM
RE: Benchmarking some machines. WIP. - by Darth-Apple - May 12th, 2020 at 11:04 PM
RE: Benchmarking some machines. WIP. - by Lain - May 27th, 2020 at 12:42 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [Project] [DIY/WIP] Hardware Keylogger (with Arduino) Lain 11 8,838 March 4th, 2020 at 7:57 PM
Last Post: Lain



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)

Dark/Light Theme Selector

Contact Us | Makestation | Return to Top | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication 
Proudly powered by MyBB 1.8, © 2002-2024
Forum design by Makestation Team © 2013-2024