Posts: 5,287
Joined: May 2013
Reputation:
181
Location: Where's North?
Items (6) ▼
Posts: 5,287
Joined: May 2013
Reputation:
181
Location: Where's North?
Items (6) ▼
May 26th, 2013 at 6:09 PM
The more recent version of Windows have required large amounts of storage space. It is currently 16GB for the latest version of Windows. Linux, by comparison, will usually run very well on 4GB, at least for most distributions.
Does anyone else think 16GB is a bit much for a clean install?
May 26th, 2013 at 6:26 PM
It's simply way too much, period. What happened to the days when Windows came on 5 1/4 inch floppy disks and installed in less than 1gb?
Posts: 5,287
Joined: May 2013
Reputation:
181
Location: Where's North?
Items (6) ▼
Posts: 5,287
Joined: May 2013
Reputation:
181
Location: Where's North?
Items (6) ▼
May 26th, 2013 at 7:11 PM
I'm afraid to know what's next, honestly. Soon enough we'll be seeing "8GB RAM, 60GB disc..." on the requirements box.
Of course we'll probably have new features to look forward to as well, but seriously, I think there comes a point where enough is enough
Posts: 8
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 8
Joined: Aug 2013
August 21st, 2013 at 9:02 AM
I don't have any idea, actually I am a student of law and do not deals with this kind of stuff.
Ban reason: "I don't have any idea, actually I am a student of law and do not deals with this kind of stuff." (Permanent)
Posts: 32
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation:
1
Posts: 32
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation:
1
August 21st, 2013 at 10:57 PM
Yeah. It's a lot. I only found out about the space when I heard that Microsoft's Surface tablet consumes around 16GB of storage space. It comes with 32GB out of the box, so that's half of your storage gone. If I remember correctly, a lawyer even sued Microsoft because of this, in the name of false advertising. I'm not sure who won or lost, but I'm sure Microsoft got away with it because it's known that the OS will consume a certain percentage of a device's storage space (for example, the iPad's iOS consumes around 6-8GB of storage space).
I never really looked at how much disk space Windows XP and Windows 7 consumed. I always purchase computers with over 300GB of storage space. The laptop that I'm currently using has around 600-700 GB of storage space, so I think I'm safe if I ever need to upgrade to Windows 8. However, I most likely will not upgrade because my laptop does not have a touchscreen and that good ol' "START" button is my best friend, lol.
(May 26th, 2013 at 7:11 PM)Darth-Apple Wrote: Of course we'll probably have new features to look forward to as well, but seriously, I think there comes a point where enough is enough
I honestly do not think it'll cross 60 GB anything soon. I think Windows 8 Pro consumes about 20GB. Again, I'm not sure. I discovered the number from a quick Google search, so don't blame me, xD
Posts: 548
Joined: May 2013
Reputation:
8
Location: Canada
Posts: 548
Joined: May 2013
Reputation:
8
Location: Canada
August 22nd, 2013 at 2:38 PM
Well when most modern games take up over a GB of disk space, the OS is bound to take up more.
And seeing as iOS take 6-8GB, I'm not surprised by how much space W8 takes up.
Posts: 5,287
Joined: May 2013
Reputation:
181
Location: Where's North?
Items (6) ▼
Posts: 5,287
Joined: May 2013
Reputation:
181
Location: Where's North?
Items (6) ▼
August 22nd, 2013 at 4:58 PM
I hope Windows comes out with a release that isn't quite so disk intensive. That isn't likely to happen, unfortunately. They'd have to take the kernel and keep that, then code everything else from scratch.
Posts: 31
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation:
1
Posts: 31
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation:
1
August 22nd, 2013 at 8:49 PM
It isn't even as if it has made Windows so wonderful. It is certainly not that intuitive to use - I know lots of people are reluctant to have anything new but a friend was really grumbling about it today.
August 23rd, 2013 at 11:07 PM
Link... some modern games take up well over 10GB of disk space. I find it ridiculous, but to be honest I think it's more reasonable for a game to use that much space than an OS. Linux can pull it off at 500MB or lower for very bare-bones distributions such as arch....
Posts: 5,287
Joined: May 2013
Reputation:
181
Location: Where's North?
Items (6) ▼
Posts: 5,287
Joined: May 2013
Reputation:
181
Location: Where's North?
Items (6) ▼
August 24th, 2013 at 12:27 AM
Then again, with the bare bones distributions you also have to install a lot of stuff to really get the usability of your computer. I usually prefer installing extra software than having to uninstall unneeded software, however.
I think 5GB for an OS is the max that should be needed.
Posts: 32
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation:
1
Posts: 32
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation:
1
August 25th, 2013 at 5:26 AM
(August 22nd, 2013 at 2:38 PM)simlink Wrote: Well when most modern games take up over a GB of disk space, the OS is bound to take up more.
And seeing as iOS take 6-8GB,
I'm not surprised by how much space W8 takes up.
Android takes up a good chunk of space too.
I'm not sure if it consumes as much as iOS, but Android 4.2.2 consumes a good amount of the 16GB of storage from my Nexus 7 tablet.
(August 22nd, 2013 at 8:49 PM)Agandl Wrote: It isn't even as if it has made Windows so wonderful. It is certainly not that intuitive to use - I know lots of people are reluctant to have anything new but a friend was really grumbling about it today.
It doesn't bug me when I'm installing the operating system on a desktop or laptop because I normally purchase those bad boys with a lot of storage space (plus it's possible to upgrade, unlike with average Joe and a tablet). If the Windows 8 tablets have microSD card slots, then I'd be fine. I think filling up the internal memory will slow it down, so that's not something I'd recommend.
(August 23rd, 2013 at 11:07 PM)cheesesc4 Wrote: Link... some modern games take up well over 10GB of disk space. I find it ridiculous, but to be honest I think it's more reasonable for a game to use that much space than an OS. Linux can pull it off at 500MB or lower for very bare-bones distributions such as arch....
Yeah. A lot of PC games consume a lot of storage. Skyrim takes up 6GB of storage according to Steam. It's a large game and I don't mind keeping it on my PC. Then again, I have over 400 GBs so it doesn't really matter. However, full virus scans are a pain, lol (can you say "long wait" again?)
August 25th, 2013 at 4:58 PM
well, I've modded the crap out of Skyrim so it takes up much more for me. I've seen, and played games that will consume nearly 15GB of storage, so Skyrim is nothing compared to that.
Posts: 5,287
Joined: May 2013
Reputation:
181
Location: Where's North?
Items (6) ▼
Posts: 5,287
Joined: May 2013
Reputation:
181
Location: Where's North?
Items (6) ▼
August 25th, 2013 at 5:07 PM
15GB is about three DVDs worth of content. Talk about a large footprint...
August 26th, 2013 at 1:22 PM
Yeah, games today are huge. TF2, for example, is more than 7GB. That's all of the weapons/items/hats they have added in the last 5 years and 300+ patches.
Posts: 5,287
Joined: May 2013
Reputation:
181
Location: Where's North?
Items (6) ▼
Posts: 5,287
Joined: May 2013
Reputation:
181
Location: Where's North?
Items (6) ▼
August 26th, 2013 at 1:22 PM
300+ patches... woah that is a lot of patches.
Posts: 2,682
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation:
105
Location: Tycho City, Tycho Crater, Luna.
Items (1) ▼
Posts: 2,682
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation:
105
Location: Tycho City, Tycho Crater, Luna.
Items (1) ▼
June 8th, 2018 at 5:09 PM
ugh windows is still too bloated even though windows 10 uses only 8gb min now.
"I reject your reality and subsitute my own." - Adam Savage, Mythbusters
|