Welcome, Guest |
Welcome to Makestation! We are a creative arts/indie discussion community — Your center for creative arts discussion, unleashed!
Please note that you must log in to participate in discussions on the forum. If you do not have an account, you can create one here. We hope you enjoy the forum!
|
|
the forum is being flooded with spammers!
|
|
the forum is being flooded with spammers!
|
|
the forum is being flooded with spammers!
|
|
the forum is being flooded with spammers!
|
|
the forum is being flooded with spammers!
|
View all updates
|
Forum Statistics |
» Members: 1,010
» Latest member: ssaru0
» Forum threads: 6,836
» Forum posts: 31,111
Full Statistics
|
Online Users |
There are currently 459 online users. » 1 Member(s) | 456 Guest(s) Applebot, Google, Mr.PrinceApe
|
|
|
Google's Congress Hearing |
Posted by: Darth-Apple - December 17th, 2018 at 7:10 PM - Forum: Web Design & Internet
- Replies (2)
|
|
As a lot of people may be aware, Google recently had a hearing with Congress about a week ago, and although the hearing was fairly lengthy, it had some noteworthy (and some amusing) content to it. found time over the past few days to watch a good part of it, and the Google CEO took the opportunity to explain many of the underpinnings of Google's technology and its search algorithms to a large number of people who had questions. Some of those questions were legitimate. A large number of them were somewhat amusing, and some even outright ridiculous.
Also, more than one representative of Congress failed to distinguish the difference between iPhones and Androids, and that they were in fact made by two separate companies.
It was 7:26 was, in my opinion, that one of the best parts of the hearing. Out of context, it doesn't seem like much, but it was actually taken as a jab towards an earlier, and somewhat amusing part of the hearing in which Google's CEO yet again got asked questions about Apple's practices by people who were confused by the fact that iPhones were not produced by Google. (See 1:13 below) Steve King has been very outspoken about negative search results that of course have nothing to do with Google itself, and I suppose, as the ancient saying goes, well, I edited the last part out to avoid any possible offensive statements. I'll just let you watch for yourself...
Anyone else watch any part of the hearing? What were your thoughts?
|
|
|
Ingress |
Posted by: SpookyZalost - November 29th, 2018 at 1:32 AM - Forum: Other Games
- Replies (13)
|
|
for those of you that don't know, Ingress is a cyberpunk themed Augmented Reality game in the same vein as pokemon go... in fact the engine and servers pokemon go uses are based on it.
I've been playing it since the end of october, I'm not level 7, playing for the resistance, and I'm having a ton of fun with it.
the rules are simple.
you either play as the resistance or the enlightened.
you capture portals for your team, link portals together.
link 3 portals together in a triangle and you create a field.
the more fields you generate the more area you control.
it's sort of an AR capture the flag sorta thing.
you can hack portals to get loot drops.
there are two types of loot, offensive loot and defensive loot.
offensive loot is stuff like XMP bursters and ultra strikes, the former is an AOE attack the latter is a direct strike at your location, within a few feet.
defensive loot is shields, turrents, resonators and a bunch of other stuff.
you capture a portal by deploying resonators around it, you can have up to 8 on any portal and their strength is dictated by the resonator level 1 through 8.
the stronger the resonator the harder it is to take down and the more energy it can store.
the highest portal level is also level 8.
you can put shields and stuff on portals to make them harder to kill.
break all the resonators and a portal becomes neutral until you or someone else captures it.
and that's pretty much it, the meat of the game is actually playing it and interacting with other players IRL.
personally, I'm soloing it, I managed to push back a group of 5 enlightened players by myself through steady leveling and loot acquisition and am now level 7, should be level 8 by January maybe? as I have the time to play it.
there's also a whole story element but I'll leave that to you guys to discover.
ask questions and or talk about the game here.
wikipedia page
|
|
|
Effects of Fracking on Environment |
Posted by: Guardian - October 26th, 2018 at 9:03 PM - Forum: Current Events
- Replies (19)
|
|
Read this article today: https://www.sfgate.com/business/technolo...338976.php
What are your thoughts on fracking, and more specifically your opinions of its impact on the environment (to include geologic events)?
In summary, in case it disappears in the future:
Quote: The only company drilling for shale gas in Britain temporarily suspended fracking Friday after a mild earthquake.
Cuadrilla said it halted drilling for 18 hours after a tremor was detected at its site in Little Plumpton, northwest England.
The British Geological Survey recorded the 0.8-magitude quake just after 11:30 a.m. Friday. It followed several smaller tremors earlier in the week.
Under U.K. rules, any tremor over 0.5 is classed as a "red event" and sparks a temporary shutdown while monitoring continues.
Cuadrilla said the tiny tremor was "way below anything that would be felt at surface, much less cause any harm or damage."
Fracking in Britain was halted after two tremors in the same area led to legal challenges. It resumed on Oct. 15.
Environmental activists failed in early October in Britain's High Court to keep Cuadrilla's fracking from proceeding.
Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, involves pumping water and chemicals at high pressure to fracture shale rock and release gas.
|
|
|
Apple is now blocking any third party repairs (mostly) |
Posted by: Darth-Apple - October 5th, 2018 at 4:58 AM - Forum: Technology & Hardware
- Replies (2)
|
|
Apple has long been known to have fostered a somewhat greedy ecosystem in many respects when it comes to profits. And this has been compounded over the past few years. Think about the removal of the headphone jack on the iphones (the new ones don't even come with a dongle anymore) and the $70 fast charger that is not even included with new iPhones. Then it was the macbooks that had extremely pricey keyboard repairs and no ports, requiring a dongle to convert a single USB C port to any other port that you would need.
And now... they will be bricked and rendered useless if a third party repair to a screen, SSD, memory, or anything else is done to the computer. They are doing this by requiring a proprietary system diagnostics system to be run after a hardware repair, which is something only Apple will have access to.
And it's honestly unfortunate for a few reasons. Firstly, cost. Screen repairs alone at Apple will cost several hundred dollars, whereas a local shop can easily do one for less than $150. Secondly, old macs are generally considered legacy after five or six years, meaning Apple themselves won't even repair it. Mine is six years old. It will probably be considered legacy soon.
I love macs to death. I truly do. But my computer is getting a bit old. I hate the 1280x800 screen, it has had RAM problems (which I fixed by removing a bad stick, thereby slowing down my computer and running RAM in single channel mode), and has a 3rd generation i5 that can't really handle Mojave that well and is no good for any kind of gaming whatsoever. I'd love to get a new one, but I'm almost unsure of what I would replace it with. The new macbooks are almost impossible to repair, very expensive, have no ports, and have keyboards that are unusually hard to type on.
Looks like I'm either getting a 2015 air (actually not a bad computer), or just sticking with this one. Not quite ready to go back to a PC yet, but for the time being, not sure the Mac is going to be a better option in the long term either.
Source: https://www.theverge.com/2018/10/4/17938...t-software
|
|
|
Collapsible boxes using only CSS and HTML |
Posted by: SpookyZalost - October 4th, 2018 at 2:53 PM - Forum: Resources & Tutorials
- Replies (2)
|
|
So for the past few days I've been tinkering with ways to make my own website more efficient, especially the tech mods section because that's going to have a lot of content and scrolling through it all to get to what you want might be a bit tedius. Because of this I've been searching for a few days on how to create collasible boxes. The main problem I ran into is that most sources say "use javascript, you have to use javascript, etc." However I found a source that actually gave explanations on how to use HTML and CSS only to create one.
This turned out to work really well, so well I've decided to share the details and any minor tweaks I made to make it suit better for columns and such.
now originally my CSS looked a little something like this.
Code: <style>
* {
box-sizing: border-box;
.textbox {
background: rgba(0,0,0,0.7);
border: 2px inset #54fbe5; /* Cyberpunk blue */
border-radius: 20px;
-moz-border-radius:20px;
-webkit-transition-duration: 0.4s; /* Safari */
padding:10px 10px;
}
}
that is the CSS I used to make the text boxes work and when combined with the following HTML it made the site's cool design work well without sacrificing text visibility
Code: <div class="textbox">
<center><h2>Header</h2></center>
<p>Lorum Ipsum Textboxum contentium</p>
</div>
that HTML then had to be used for each "box" that had to be entered on the site.
as you can imagine this would look rather cluttered with full size postings taking up entire sections of the page.
well...
Having thought about it I had a tough decision to make... should I add Javascript to my site?
it's currently using no JS at all!, surprising I know right?
then I sumbled Upon this happy bit of CSS code right here.
Code: .wrap-collabsible {
margin-bottom: 1.2rem 0;
}
input[type='checkbox'] {
display: none;
}
.lbl-toggle {
display: block;
font-family: "Courier New", Courier, monospace;
font-size: 20px;
letter-spacing: 0px;
word-spacing: -5px;
font-weight: 700;
text-decoration: none solid rgb(68, 68, 68);
font-style: normal;
font-variant: normal;
text-transform: none;
padding: 8px;
margin: 8px;
text-align: center;
padding: 1rem;
background: rgba(0,0,0,0.7);
cursor: pointer;
border: 2px inset #54fbe5; /* Cyberpunk blue */
border-radius: 20px;
transition: all 0.25s ease-out;
}
.lbl-toggle:hover {
color: #54fbe5;
}
.lbl-toggle::before {
content: ' ';
display: inline-block;
border-top: 5px solid transparent;
border-bottom: 5px solid transparent;
border-left: 5px solid currentColor;
vertical-align: middle;
margin-right: .7rem;
transform: translateY(-2px);
transition: transform .2s ease-out;
}
.toggle:checked + .lbl-toggle::before {
transform: rotate(90deg) translateX(-3px);
}
.collapsible-content {
max-height: 0px;
overflow: hidden;
transition: max-height .25s ease-in-out;
}
.toggle:checked + .lbl-toggle + .collapsible-content {
max-height: 5000px;
}
.toggle:checked + .lbl-toggle {
border-bottom-right-radius: 0;
border-bottom-left-radius: 0;
}
.collapsible-content .content-inner {
background: rgba(250, 224, 66, .2);
border-bottom: 1px solid rgba(250, 224, 66, .45);
border-bottom-left-radius: 7px;
border-bottom-right-radius: 7px;
padding: .5rem 1rem;
}
now basically what that does is tells the CSS style sheet and HTML how to make a button which expands and collapses a box.
Code: <div class="column content">
<div class="wrap-collabsible">
<input id="collapsiblenumber" class="toggle" type="checkbox">
<label for="collapsiblenumber" class="lbl-toggle">More Info</label>
<div class="collapsible-content">
<div class="content-inner">
<p>
QUnit is by calling one of the object that are embedded in JavaScript, and faster JavaScript program could also used with
its elegant, well documented, and functional programming using JS, HTML pages Modernizr is a popular browsers without
plug-ins. Test-Driven Development.
</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
then the above HTML code would make that button visible on the page.
I however tweaked this a bit.
Code: <div class="wrap-collabsible">
<input id="collapsible1" class="toggle" type="checkbox">
<label for="collapsible1" class="lbl-toggle">Button Label/Post title</label>
<div class="collapsible-content">
<div class="textbox">
<p> Insert Conent here </p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
the main changes I made was to make the <div class="content-inner"> into <div class="textbox"> Thus converting the button's style into the one I had been using for my textboxes.
the end result?
No Javascript required.
also a heads up you need to label each collapsible box like so
<input id="collapsible1" class="toggle" type="checkbox">
<label for="collapsible1" class="lbl-toggle">Button Label/Post title</label>
<input id="collapsible2" class="toggle" type="checkbox">
<label for="collapsible2" class="lbl-toggle">Button Label/Post title</label>
<input id="collapsible3" class="toggle" type="checkbox">
<label for="collapsible3" class="lbl-toggle">Button Label/Post title</label>
otherwise you'll end up having one button open the wrong box, or all the boxes.
hope that was informative.
Zalost - Out.
|
|
|
|