Makestation

http://politicalcompass.org/test

It's definitely an interesting test I'd recommend to anyone. I scored out as being slightly upper-left wing.

hehe

I scored about the same place on the compass, but I'm very slightly upper wing instead. Seems like we're pretty much in the same camp.

I'm left leaning. Surprise surprise (not)

I stand at -2.75, -5.74



(link if you want to print this to honor my beautiful score on your wall: http://politicalcompass.org/printablegra...&soc=-5.74)

that was interesting - but a bit broad brush

Economic Left/Right: -5.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.97

A.

Economic Left/Right: -4.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.59

Economic Left/Right: 3.0 
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.08

huh, I've unexpectedly become more libertarian and socialist in the past couple years.

Economic Left/Right: -6.5
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.44

(February 22nd, 2019 at 2:03 AM)SpookyZalost Wrote: [ -> ]huh, I've unexpectedly become more libertarian and socialist in the past couple years.

Economic Left/Right: -6.5
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.44

Socialist would go more up than left. Left is more liberal socially. Socialist is more fiscally authoritarian.

well i do kinda consider myself a technocratic social democrat

(February 22nd, 2019 at 2:15 AM)SpookyZalost Wrote: [ -> ]well i do kinda consider myself a technocratic social democrat

Now you lost me. :

whatever is best for the people, determined by the people via majority, with the most skilled and best qualified in charge.

(February 22nd, 2019 at 2:17 AM)SpookyZalost Wrote: [ -> ]...with the most skilled and best qualified in charge.

That's always subjective though. Who determines this? Depending on personal politics this could skew in many directions. Democratic Socialists of 1930's Germany thought this guy to be Hitler, 1930's Chinese Communists thought this person to be Mao Zedong, while 1900's pro-Independence Indians thought his person to be Mohandas Ghandi. 

It could go many ways.

eh I don't like the idea of a singular leader, I like the idea of a council of experts with the president mainly being a specialized diplomat who works with other nations.

(February 22nd, 2019 at 2:30 AM)SpookyZalost Wrote: [ -> ]eh I don't like the idea of a singular leader, I like the idea of a council of experts with the president mainly being a specialized diplomat who works with other nations.

The problem is the 'majority' has proven incapable of selecting these experts/representatives that have their best interest in mind.

that's why I think the council of experts (each one overseeing something relating to their skillset), should be determined in a neutral non-biased way based purely on capability.

it's not perfect, but it's better than letting one person control the entire country, especially given how some of our leaders have been over the years.

(February 22nd, 2019 at 2:37 AM)SpookyZalost Wrote: [ -> ]that's why I think the council of experts (each one overseeing something relating to their skillset), should be determined in a neutral non-biased way based purely on capability.

it's not perfect, but it's better than letting one person control the entire country, especially given how some of our leaders have been over the years.

Maybe this concept needs a charter, and can be applied to the Moderns faction.

I'll stick with my wild west ways for the Ancients.